TRIAL BY WRITTEN DECLARATION

The answer is simple, because if you don’t have a competent traffic ticket lawyer in a traffic trial, you may lose the trial and lose big and badly.  You would not have a chance on your own to successfully fight the traffic ticket.   You will find yourself in an unknown and hostile place without a traffic ticket lawyer and you would not know the legal consequences of what the judge or officer talking about.

The Trial by Declaration prepared by a competent traffic lawyer knows how easy it is for officers to convict and the traffic ticket lawyer will file a motion in law to remind the judge that inadmissible documentary evidence cannot be considered by the court.  

 Cops are always trying to use inadmissible documentary evidence.  For example in a radar speeding case, the cop will just check off a box as a substitute for admissible documentary evidence.  The Trial by Declaration is a powerful weapon with a proper weapon to stop this practice.

 The officer will testify and talk about things and concepts you have no clue about. In a Trial by Declaration, the cop does not get to testify, he just fills out this form with checked off boxes in it as a substitute for admissible documentary evidence.

 Without a traffic ticket lawyer, to prepare a competent Trial by Declaration, you will be clueless and unable to stop his inadmissible evidence against you.  While it is true in that in a court trial, you need a traffic trial lawyer to cut off the cop’s inadmissible evidence, in a Trial by Declaration, you don’t need a traffic ticket lawyer with you, but you do need a competent Trial by Declaration prepared to stop inadmissible evidence from coming in against you.

 The officer gets to talk first (but not in a Trial by Declaration!) and you cannot interrupt him.  You could interrupt him with legal objections, except you would not know any legal objections.

 You could not prevent the officer from convicting you.  A traffic ticket lawyer in court would prevent the officer’s testimony based on inadmissible documentary evidence from convicting you.

 In a Trial by Declaration this is done with a proper objection to inadmissible documentary evidence. You must fight the traffic ticket and beat the moving violation with a competent traffic ticket lawyer.  Remember, that with a Trial by Declaration, the cop does not get to testify.

 Isn’t it clear that you would need the expertise of a traffic ticket lawyer, in the court trial, to successfully fight traffic tickets, and to crush the officer’s efforts to convict you with inadmissible evidence? 

 Isn’t it clear that a Trial by Declaration, you don’t need a traffic ticket lawyer there in the judge’s chambers as he decides the case on strong law defenses prepared by your traffic ticket lawyer to beat the traffic ticket.

 If you had a traffic ticket lawyer, he would fight the ticket in court and stop the cop in his testimonial tracks.  No any moving violation conviction would be possible with a traffic ticket lawyer and an officer who cheats with inadmissible evidence.  No inadmissible evidence can survive the objections of a traffic ticket lawyer.  If you represent yourself in court, the officers testimony that would convict you.

 You would not be able fight the ticket, and to stop that condemning evidence, even though it shouldn’t be spoken by the officer.  You would not know why the evidence is not admissible.  Can you appreciate the importance of a traffic ticket lawyer?

 Please consider the wisdom of filing a Trial by Declaration to avoid a lot of the pitfalls of representing yourself in a traffic ticket court trial.

  In a Trial by Declaration, without a traffic ticket lawyer objecting to inadmissible documentary evidence and keeping it out, you would be a sitting duck and unable to fight the traffic ticket and defend yourself.   A moving violation with its DMV  point will cripple and could triple your insurance.  So, file a Trial by Declaration before you even think about having a court trial of your traffic ticket. 

 A traffic ticket lawyer with legal objections can stop the slaughter. You could not do it.   Why? Because you don’t know anything about legal objections nor would you have experience to stop the inadmissible evidence coming in against you.   

 A trial is about giving evidence and the judge decides the case on the basis of the evidence that comes in against you, or the absence of that evidence.  That’s why you need a traffic ticket lawyer in a traffic ticket case.

 The inadmissible documentary evidence must be objected to and kept out whether in a Trial by Declaration or court trial.  That means the judge cannot consider objected to and excluded inadmissible evidence. Fight the ticket with a traffic ticket lawyer that knows what he’s doing.